before we discuss the button, here are the positive and negative voting options on the 4 main social news sites: digg allows people to either ‘digg’ the story or bury it as duplicate story, spam, wrong topic, inaccurate and ok, this is lame, propeller allows users to either vote on a story or ’sink’ it (and separately report a story as broken link, duplicate, inflammatory, inaccurate, lame, and spam) reddit allows upvoting or downvoting, and stumbleupon gives you the option to vote either ‘i like it!’ or ‘no more like this’ on a given story.
as you can see, the options for burying content are quite robust and allow the algorithms behind these sites to accurately determine how much people dislike the story and want it gone, but the options for promoting content aren’t as developed. for example, the question i ask myself whenever i’m voting for stories on social news sites and come across something truly outrageous is: yes, i want the story to receive more attention so the issue can be resolved, but do i really like what is happening? of course not. while in practice it’s not really a problem, in spirit i don’t want to be ‘digging’ or ‘i like it’ a story about child rape.
in fact, i think that when we vote on stories, we should have just as many options to ‘vote as…’ as we do when we bury something. here are some of the classifiers that i would like to see:
- general vote.
- vote as funny.
- vote as interesting.
- vote as important (timely/time-sensitive).
- vote as outrageous.
just as different ways of burying something carry different weights (for example, something that is buried as spam will be removed from the queue where as something can be promoted, marked as inaccurate but still stay on the front page) different ways of voting on something should also carry different weights. something that has the most amount of votes as important (breaking news, heath ledger’s death) should probably be promoted faster than something that has lots of votes as funny (pictures of a cats).
furthermore, we can actually display a tag next to the story so that once it is promoted to the front page, visitors can decide wether they want to read a story or not based solely on the tag (funny, important, outrageous, etc.). the one site that does a somewhat decent job at that is fark.
what do you think of this idea and what kind of ‘vote as…’ or ‘promoted as…’ tags would you like to see?
Technorati Tags: social media, digg, propeller, reddit, stumbleupon, fark, vote, bury